Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alfred A. Barrios
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:53, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- Alfred A. Barrios (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One citation... does not appear notable to me. RobP (talk) 18:54, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Article was created by a SPA. My guess is the subject himself, or someone close to him. See: here RobP (talk) 18:58, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - I can find nothing to indicate this subject meets either the general or academic notability standards. A News search finds only a short interview from 2015 and a passing reference in a piece from 2011. Neither is in English so I can't be certain what they say, but neither is substantial. JSTOR does not list a single publication of his. I searched for evidence of the awards that are mentioned, but without success. The article is replete with impressive-sounding claims that do not appear to be supported by evidence.--Gronk Oz (talk) 19:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - one citation and the article was written in 2010 and it is still here. Shame on us. And sadly it does appear to have been a SPA that wrote it. As Gronk Oz says the wording is clearly glowing and no citations to support those glows, when clearly there should be. Also notice the name L Ron Hubbard which always sends red flags up the flagpole for me.Sgerbic (talk) 19:51, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 22:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere talk 22:56, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Obvious delete, per nom. SEMMENDINGER (talk) 03:01, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Notability not established. The one source cited does mention the subject after archive rescue, but it is of low quality, does not support the associated claim, and is the author's own work. Poorlyglot (talk) 12:39, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete PhD clinical psychologists are not default notable for being such and nothing else suggests notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:56, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - As mentioned, only one source exists and it is not independent of the subject per WP:GNG. JeffreyV55 (talk) 03:51, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.